Wednesday, October 16, 2013
Strengthening the Capacity of Future Pillars of Science and Mathematics Education
The Department of Science
and Technology-Science Education Institute (DOST-SEI) invited three
UP NISMED staff, Dr. Amelia Punzalan, Dr. Erlina Ronda, and Ms.
Arlene de la Cruz, as resource speakers on its 2nd year of
training workshop on research enhancement. The training workshop was
held on 4-6 September 2012 at Punta de Fabian, Baras, Rizal.
The participants were 27
faculty members of Teacher Training Institutes (TEIs) representing
different regions of the country. These TEIs were identified by the
Commission on Higher Education (CHED) as Centers of Development.
From CHED Memorandum
Order No. 33 Series of 2012, a Center of Development (COD) refers to
a teacher education program in an HEI (Higher Education Institution),
which demonstrates the potential to become a COE (Center of
Excellence) in the future. A COE is defined as a teacher education
program in an HEI, which continuously demonstrates excellent
performance in the areas of instruction, research and publication,
extension and linkages, institutional qualifications and one that
provides excellent quality pre-service teacher education program to
meet the needs of progressive teachers for elementary, secondary, and
special education programs. The identified COEs and CODs are expected
to serve as instruments in attaining and fulfilling the program’s
mission of producing professionally competent and morally upright
teacher education graduates.
Ms. de la Cruz started
the session with De Bono’s six (6) thinking hats to set the tone of
the workshop. Activities in the thinking hats were used as
springboard for the participants’ research topics as well as in
setting of goals for lesson study and other research projects.
Dr. Punzalan talked
about teaching science through inquiry. She presented different ways
to show how inquiry can be part of the participants’ researches in
their classrooms and how it can be used as a teaching strategy.
Dr. Ronda talked about
problem solving as strategy for teaching mathematics. She also used
lesson study to further explain problem solving and showed a video on
a mathematics lesson study implementation.
On the third day, the
participants presented their research topics as well as their planned
methodologies. Critiquing of the research topics was done after each
presentation. The Central Bicol State University of Agriculture -
College of Development Education from Region V, and Xavier University
- Faculty of Education from Region XII planned to do research related
to lesson study.
National Summer Training Workshop on Lesson Study
UP NISMEDOctober 16, 2013K-12 curriculum, lesson study, lesson study training, Training, up nismed
1 comment:
Guro Foundation Forum
(GFF) organized a National Summer Training Workshop on Lesson Study
in view of the K to 12 implementation across disciplines on 7-12 May
2012. It was held at the Bulwagang Tandang Sora, College of Social
Work and Community Development, University of the Philippines,
Diliman, Quezon City. There were 40 teacher-participants from Metro
Manila and Luzon and four Filipino teachers from Lebanon. All grade
levels were represented in the said workshop.
The objective of the
training workshop was to engage educators in instructional planning,
management, and implementation of K to 12 curriculum using lesson
study.
Five NISMED staff were
invited as resource speakers and facilitator. Dr. Soledad A. Ulep, UP
NISMED Director, spoke on Lesson Study in View of the K to 12
Implementation. Dr. Amelia E. Punzalan and Ms. Arlene P. de la
Cruz talked on Teaching Chemistry and Teaching-Learning Science
Through Inquiry. Dr. Erlina R. Ronda talked about Teaching
Mathematics Through Problem Solving, with Mr. Allan Canonigo as
facilitator.
Lesson Study was done in
four subjects, namely, English, Mathematics, Science, and Social
Studies. Teachers had lesson planning, brainstorming, and critiquing
of lessons. The lessons were based on the K to12 Curriculum.
Tuesday, October 15, 2013
“PLANNING TOGETHER” IS NOT THAT EASY
UP NISMEDOctober 15, 2013collaborative lesson planning, lesson planning, lesson study, Science
No comments:
[This article presents
the challenges faced by practicing teachers in the course of
developing lessons in Physics from the point of view of a member of
the study group.]
“Ma’am, baka pwedeng bigyan n’yo na lang kami
ng lesson plan at iexecute na lang namin?”
(Ma’am, can you just give us a prepared lesson plan and then we
will just execute it?) One teacher of our lesson study group in
Physics asked during the initial planning of the lesson. What made
the teacher to ask this question?
Lesson study is about planning together to develop,
implement, and improve a research lesson. “Planning together” is
not something new to teachers. They plan on activities in school such
as Science Fairs and school foundation day celebration but “planning
together to come up with a lesson” is something unusual to them.
Teachers are used to prepare their own lesson plans and implement
them as they see fit. In a school, where there may be five or more
physics teachers, it is possible that these teachers differ in the
way they teach the same topic. Hence, asking teachers to plan a
lesson together faces a lot of challenges.
Finding time for planning the lesson was a challenge. In
our lesson study group, the teachers had to meet around lunchtime to
plan the lesson because they have classes in the afternoon.
Requesting them to come at this time was sometimes inconvenient for
them because they had personal matters to attend to. That was the
reason why a teacher asked for a prepared lesson plan to execute
instead of planning together to prepare a new one.
Finding the right activity for the lesson was a
challenge. Teachers acknowledge that letting the students do an
activity is a good practice. During the planning of the lesson, the
teachers brought activities they used in the previous school year. As
they presented the activities, they were asked some questions: 1)
Will the activities help your students to
discover the concept/s you want them to know? 2) Will the students be
able to discover the concept on their own? 3) What skills will be
developed through the activity? 4) Do you have the materials (or
enough materials) needed for the activity? These
questions were asked for teachers to realize that it was not enough
that students perform an activity for the sake of doing an activity.
Teachers had to evaluate the activity they were using. If the
activity does not meet the objectives of the lesson, they have to
select a more appropriate one or make some revisions. Moreover, the
teachers were asked to tryout the activity. There were situations
during the planning that they had to replace the activity or some
materials because the activity or material itself was not working. As
a result, it took several meetings just to come up with an activity.
Thus, teachers would say, “Hindi pala ganito
kadali gumawa ng activity (It is not so easy
to come up with an activity).”
Finding the appropriate strategy for a lesson was a
challenge. The usual sequence followed by the teacher in teaching a
science lesson is as follows: motivation, presentation of the concept
(including equation), performing the activity (if there is an
activity), guided solving of a sample problem, individual or group
problem solving, assessment, and homework. However, the formulated
goal for the lesson study was “To develop and nurture self-directed
learners who have enduring understanding of science concepts that can
be applied in real-life situations.” Their
usual way of teaching would not work to attain this goal because if
the teachers would simply give the concepts and equations, then the
students would become passive learners. Thus, there is a need for the
teacher to shift from being the source of information to a
facilitator of learning. They should guide their students to discover
the concepts on their own. To do this, the teachers have to think of
the questions they would ask to elicit thinking among the students as
well as the possible answers the students might give. Writing these
in their lesson plan would allow the teachers to anticipate different
scenarios that might happen during the class discussion. Planning the
lesson this way involves detailed and focused discussion and by
itself a challenge to a teacher who is used to deciding by herself or
himself on how to go about the lesson.
Indeed, planning together is not that easy. Yes, it
takes time to plan, choose an activity, and find an appropriate
teaching strategy. But to see the students enjoying the activity,
asking questions, and participating in class discussions are enough
rewards for the challenges faced. Going back to the teacher who asked
for a prepared lesson plan to execute, she no longer asked this
question in the succeeding cycles of planning. She became more
participative in the discussions and even implemented two lessons
made by the study group. Clearly, by embracing the challenges of
doing a lesson study paved the way for her professional development.
The experience with lesson study embodies this quote by Henry Ford:
“Coming together is a beginning; keeping together is progress;
working together is success.”